1. Promoted collaboration among scientists.
2. Generated scientific discourse and discussion.
3. Increased awareness and interest in the theories of consciousness. 4. Showed progress in the field, despite the lack of a definitive conclusion.
1. Did not provide conclusive evidence for the theories of consciousness. 2. No clear winners or resolution, leaving the question unanswered.
3. Limited to a stagy showdown, potentially limiting the depth of the investigation. 4. May have raised false expectations about proving the theories.
Scientists engaged in a five-year adversarial collaboration, culminating in a dramatic showdown witnessed by an audience. Although there were no winners declared, this process signifies significant progress.