Is Biden’s threat of visa bans justified in the fight against Palestinian attacks in the West Bank?

Pros:
– Visa bans can serve as a deterrent and potentially discourage violence against Palestinians in the West Bank.
– It sends a clear message that the US is taking a stand against violence and human rights abuses in the region.
– By imposing visa bans, it may put pressure on those responsible for the attacks to reconsider their actions.
– This action demonstrates the US’s commitment to protecting the rights and safety of Palestinians.

Cons:
– Visa bans might not address the root causes of the conflict, which require a more comprehensive and long-term approach.
– There is a possibility that innocent individuals could be affected by these visa bans, leading to unintended consequences.
– The effectiveness of visa bans in curbing violence and achieving lasting peace is uncertain.
– It runs the risk of escalating tensions, making negotiations and finding a peaceful resolution more challenging.

context: https://www.cnn.com/2023/11/18/politics/biden-aims-to-retain-support-for-fights-against-russia-and-hamas-in-op-ed/index.html

In a recently published op-ed, President Joe Biden addressed the issue of violence against Palestinians in the West Bank. This signals that the US government is willing to take action, including potentially issuing visa bans.