Is Robert De Niro’s outburst on the witness stand justified or detrimental to his defamation trial?

– Expressing emotions can bring awareness to the severity of the situation. – Outburst may demonstrate passion and conviction in defending oneself. – Attract media attention and public sympathy.
– May intimidate the opposing party and put them on the defensive.

– Outburst can be seen as unprofessional and undermine credibility. – May distract from the actual issues being discussed in the trial. – Could be perceived as aggressive or intimidating behavior. – Might alienate the judge or jury, swaying them against De Niro.


During a civil trial in New York City, Robert De Niro unleashed his anger towards his former personal assistant on the witness stand. The trial will determine if he harassed her during their working relationship, among other accusations.