Pros:
1. The U.S. has historically played a significant role in global affairs, which allows it to have influence and make a difference.
2. By engaging and participating actively in resolving conflicts, the U.S. can foster diplomatic relationships and build trust with other nations.
3. Taking steps to address the suffering in Gaza could lead to the potential for a more peaceful and stable region.
4. Being seen as taking action to protect civilian lives can enhance the U.S.’s reputation as a defender of human rights.
5. Working towards a resolution in Gaza can potentially contribute to broader efforts in achieving lasting peace in the Middle East.
Cons:
1. The U.S.’s involvement in the situation may be seen as unwarranted interference by some, hindering diplomatic progress.
2. Taking sides in a conflict could strain relationships with certain Middle Eastern countries and impact other geopolitical priorities.
3. Finding a solution that is acceptable to all stakeholders involved in the Gaza conflict is a complex and challenging task.
4. Publicly criticizing the U.S. for its role in the situation could lead to a further deterioration of diplomatic ties with Arab leaders.
5. The U.S. may face accusations of partiality if it is perceived as siding with either Israel or Palestine, potentially undermining its credibility as a mediator.
context: https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2023/11/11/us-israel-gaza-civilian-deaths/
Secretary of State Antony Blinken faced criticism from Arab leaders who warned that the United States would be seen as complicit in the civilian casualties resulting from Israel’s uncontrolled attack on Gaza.
