Is Trading for Joshua Dobbs the Solution for the Vikings’ Quarterback Crisis?

Pros of Trading for Joshua Dobbs:

1. Potential for a fresh start: Dobbs has shown flashes of talent and could benefit from a change of scenery.

2. Cost-effective option: Trading for Dobbs might be a more budget-friendly approach compared to pursuing high-profile quarterbacks.

3. Versatility: Dobbs’ ability to contribute as both a passer and a rusher could add a dynamic element to the Vikings’ offense.

4. Depth and competition: Acquiring Dobbs provides the Vikings with another capable quarterback option to compete and push the remaining players on their roster.

Cons of Trading for Joshua Dobbs:

1. Inexperience: Dobbs has limited experience as a starter, which raises questions about his readiness to take on the starting role for a team in crisis.

2. Unproven track record: While Dobbs has shown potential, he has yet to consistently deliver at the NFL level, leaving uncertainty about his ability to lead the Vikings’ offense effectively.

3. System fit: Dobbs’ skillset may not align perfectly with the Vikings’ offensive system, potentially requiring adjustments that could disrupt the team’s established rhythm.

4. Lack of immediate impact: It may take time for Dobbs to develop and adjust to the Vikings’ playbook, potentially delaying their ability to find a solution to their quarterback crisis.

Remember, this assessment is based on the information provided and does not guarantee the outcome of trading for Joshua Dobbs.


In response to Kirk Cousins’ season-ending injury, the Vikings took action to bolster their quarterback position. They made a trade with the Cardinals to acquire Joshua Dobbs.