Was Israel justified in shooting down a ballistic missile from Yemen? – U.S. officials share details

1. Protection: Shooting down the ballistic missile ensured the safety and security of Israeli citizens.
2. Deterrence: By responding swiftly and effectively, Israel sends a strong message to potential aggressors.
3. Defense cooperation: The incident highlights the close partnership between the U.S. and Israel in sharing intelligence and addressing common security threats.
4. Regional stability: Taking action against the aggressor promotes stability in the volatile region and discourages further acts of aggression.
5. International law: Israel has the right to defend itself against incoming threats, including ballistic missiles, under international law.

1. Escalation risk: The act of shooting down a ballistic missile has the potential to escalate the conflict, leading to further violence and instability.
2. Potential casualties: In intercepting the missile, there is a risk of unintended harm to civilian populations or infrastructure.
3. Diplomatic backlash: The incident may strain diplomatic relations with certain countries or factions sympathetic to the Houthi rebels.
4. Financial costs: Engaging in defensive measures, including missile interception, can be financially burdensome for the countries involved.
5. Public perception: Some may question the proportionality of the response or the necessity of shooting down the missile.

context: https://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/israel-shot-down-ballistic-missile-fired-yemen-us-officials-say-rcna122936

On Tuesday, according to two U.S. officials, it was reported that militants, suspected to be Iran-backed Houthi rebels, launched a medium-range ballistic missile from Yemen towards Israel.