1. Protection: Shooting down the ballistic missile ensured the safety and security of Israeli citizens.
2. Deterrence: By responding swiftly and effectively, Israel sends a strong message to potential aggressors.
3. Defense cooperation: The incident highlights the close partnership between the U.S. and Israel in sharing intelligence and addressing common security threats.
4. Regional stability: Taking action against the aggressor promotes stability in the volatile region and discourages further acts of aggression.
5. International law: Israel has the right to defend itself against incoming threats, including ballistic missiles, under international law.
1. Escalation risk: The act of shooting down a ballistic missile has the potential to escalate the conflict, leading to further violence and instability.
2. Potential casualties: In intercepting the missile, there is a risk of unintended harm to civilian populations or infrastructure.
3. Diplomatic backlash: The incident may strain diplomatic relations with certain countries or factions sympathetic to the Houthi rebels.
4. Financial costs: Engaging in defensive measures, including missile interception, can be financially burdensome for the countries involved.
5. Public perception: Some may question the proportionality of the response or the necessity of shooting down the missile.
On Tuesday, according to two U.S. officials, it was reported that militants, suspected to be Iran-backed Houthi rebels, launched a medium-range ballistic missile from Yemen towards Israel.