Pros:
– Medium-caliber cannons have a higher rate of fire compared to larger cannons, allowing for a higher number of rounds to be fired in a shorter period of time.
– The smaller size and weight of these cannons make them more maneuverable, allowing for easier deployment and use in various terrains.
– Their effectiveness against troops and soft targets lies in their ability to deliver a concentrated and rapid burst of firepower.
– These cannons can be mounted on infantry fighting vehicles and armored vehicles, increasing their versatility on the battlefield.
– Smaller cannons typically require less logistical support and can be more cost-effective compared to larger cannons.
Cons:
– Compared to larger cannons, medium-caliber cannons might have a shorter range, limiting their effectiveness in certain combat scenarios.
– The smaller size of these cannons can also result in a lower muzzle velocity, potentially reducing their kinetic energy and penetration capabilities.
– Despite their devastating potential against troops and soft targets, these cannons may be less effective against heavily armored vehicles and fortified positions.
– The use of smaller cannons may require a higher number of ammunition resupplies, which could hamper sustained operations.
– Additionally, the reliance on medium-caliber cannons may divert resources away from the development and utilization of larger, more powerful artillery systems.
Medium-caliber cannons, typically mounted on infantry fighting vehicles and armored vehicles, possess significant firepower capable of inflicting catastrophic damage on enemy troops and soft targets alike.
