Pros of countries voting against the UN resolution for a ‘humanitarian truce’ in Gaza: 1. Have different geopolitical interests and concerns regarding the situation.
2. They might believe that other approaches could be more effective in achieving a peaceful resolution.
Cons of countries voting against the UN resolution for a ‘humanitarian truce’ in Gaza: 1. Potentially prolonging the suffering of the people in Gaza.
2. Going against the international community’s efforts to promote peace and alleviate humanitarian crises.
Please note that the full list of countries is not provided, so the specific pros and cons for each country cannot be outlined.
The UN General Assembly, led by Jordan, passed a resolution urging for a humanitarian ceasefire in Gaza. The resolution received support from 120 nations, while 14 countries voted against it. Additionally, 45 countries, including Canada, abstained from voting.
