Pros for Meta Quest 3:
1. Full-color passthrough provides a more immersive visual experience.
2. Lightweight ringless controllers offer greater comfort during extended play sessions. 3. Pancake lenses provide clearer and more vibrant visuals.
4. Wireless design allows for freedom of movement without worrying about tripping over cables.
Cons for Meta Quest 3:
1. Lack of haptic feedback may result in a less tactile VR experience.
2. The absence of eye tracking might limit certain interactive features and experiences.
3. AAA games offered by Meta might be more limited compared to the PSVR 2 lineup.
4. The built-in halo strap may not offer the same level of support as the PSVR 2 alternative.
Pros for PSVR 2:
1. Haptics enhance the sense of touch, making the VR experience more immersive.
2. Eye tracking could potentially open up new interactive possibilities in games and applications.
3. Higher-quality display delivers stunning visuals with improved clarity and detail.
4. The more supportive built-in halo strap ensures better comfort and reduces strain during gameplay.
5. The availability of AAA games provides a wider range of high-quality gaming options.
Cons for PSVR 2:
1. Lack of full-color passthrough might result in a less realistic visual experience.
2. Ringless controllers may not be as lightweight and comfortable as the Meta Quest 3 alternative. 3. The absence of pancake lenses might impact the overall visual quality.
4. The requirement of cables may restrict movement and pose potential tripping hazards.
context: https://www.androidcentral.com/gaming/virtual-reality/meta-quest-3-vs-psvr-2
Sony has enhanced the PSVR 2 with haptics, eye tracking, a superior display, and an improved halo strap. Additionally, they offer a lineup of AAA games that Meta lacks. On the other hand, Meta boasts features such as full-color passthrough, lightweight ringless controllers, pancake lenses, and a wireless design.
